Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo S16
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo S16 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S16 leads — 39/100 vs 30/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo S16 is noticeably lighter (182g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo S16
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4600 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 182g vs 199g
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (72/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo S16, the Vivo S16 scores 9 points higher (39/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 leads (50/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (50/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo S16 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo S16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, Origin OS 3 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 182 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo S16
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo S16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (50/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo S16 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo S16?
The Vivo S16 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo S16?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo S16 — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo S16?
The Vivo S16 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo S16?
The Vivo S16 leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo S16?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo S16 is a better fit for everyday use.