Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo iQOO Z6 44W
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 25/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W is noticeably lighter (182g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo iQOO Z6 44W
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 182g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (72/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 5 points higher (30/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo iQOO Z6 44W | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 421228 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 412 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1410 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 160.8×73.8×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 182 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z6 44W
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z6 44W
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z6 44W
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W — 25/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo iQOO Z6 44W?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z6 44W is a better fit for everyday use.