Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo iQOO Neo8
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo iQOO Neo8 (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 leads — 41/100 vs 30/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo8 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo iQOO Neo8
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 66W
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Higher performance (22/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo iQOO Neo8, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 scores 11 points higher (41/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 leads (22/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 leads (61/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (22/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (61/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo iQOO Neo8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1425446 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 4688 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.7×77.0×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Neo8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo8
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo8
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (22/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (61/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo iQOO Neo8?
The Vivo iQOO Neo8 is noticeably better than the Honor X40 GT Racing — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO Neo8?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 — 41/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo iQOO Neo8?
The Vivo iQOO Neo8 leads on performance (22/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo iQOO Neo8?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Neo8 is a better fit for everyday use.