Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Spark Slim
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Spark Slim (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Spark Slim leads — 34/100 vs 30/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark Slim has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 4800); the Tecno Spark Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Spark Slim
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Better camera (27/100 vs 26/100)
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 156g vs 199g
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (89/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Spark Slim, the Tecno Spark Slim scores 4 points higher (34/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Spark Slim leads (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark Slim are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark Slim and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Spark Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Spark Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (89/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Spark Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Helio G200 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 450000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 750 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2100 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5160 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.2×75.9×5.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 156 g | |
| Price | — | $299 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Spark Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Spark Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Spark Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark Slim are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark Slim and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Spark Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Spark Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (89/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Spark Slim?
The Tecno Spark Slim edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark Slim?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Spark Slim — 34/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Spark Slim?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Spark Slim is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.