Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Spark 40C
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Spark 40C (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 24/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 40C has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Spark 40C doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Spark 40C
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Spark 40C, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 6 points higher (30/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40C (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 40C and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 40C are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Spark 40C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G81 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 358383 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 432 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1416 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, HIOS 15.1 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 165.6×77.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Spark 40C
- Main: 13MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Spark 40C
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Spark 40C
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40C (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 40C and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 40C are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Spark 40C?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Tecno Spark 40C by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Spark 40C?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Spark 40C — 24/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Spark 40C?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Spark 40C?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Spark 40C is a better fit for everyday use.