Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Pova Neo 2
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 19/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Neo 2 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 16 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing is thinner (8.5mm vs 9.6mm).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 2/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Pova Neo 2, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 11 points higher (30/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 2/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (27/100 vs 2/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Neo 2 is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Neo 2 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Pova Neo 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 420 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1364 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1640 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 170.9×77.8×9.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- Main: 16MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (27/100 vs 2/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Neo 2 is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Neo 2 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova Neo 2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova Neo 2 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Neo 2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Pova Neo 2 — 19/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova Neo 2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Pova Neo 2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova Neo 2 is a better fit for everyday use.