Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Pova Curve 2
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 leads — 35/100 vs 30/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4800); the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is thinner (7.4mm vs 8.5mm).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Better camera (27/100 vs 26/100)
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 195g vs 199g
- Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (56/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Pova Curve 2, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 scores 5 points higher (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 leads (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Curve 2 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (94/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Pova Curve 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Dimensity 7100 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 835566 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 995 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2925 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2364 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 162.7×77.2×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | |
| Price | — | $229 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2364
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Curve 2 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (60/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (94/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova Curve 2?
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Curve 2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 — 35/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Pova Curve 2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova Curve 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.