Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Camon iACE2
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Camon iACE2 (2019) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 7/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 3050); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon iACE2 doesn't; the Tecno Camon iACE2 is noticeably lighter (150g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Camon iACE2
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 3050 mAh
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 150g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Camon iACE2, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 23 points higher (30/100 vs 7/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Camon iACE2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio A22 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 155362 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 300 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 486 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 3050 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | — | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 148.3×71.9×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 150 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon iACE2
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon iACE2
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon iACE2
- 3050 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 (43/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon iACE2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2 by 23 points (30/100 vs 7/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon iACE2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Camon iACE2 — 7/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon iACE2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Camon iACE2?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Camon iACE2 is a better fit for everyday use.