Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Camon 50 Slim
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 30/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4800); the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is noticeably lighter (175g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- Faster charging: 66W vs 60W
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 175g vs 199g
- Better camera (34/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (95/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Camon 50 Slim, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim scores 7 points higher (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim leads (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (95/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Camon 50 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | — | 450000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 750 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2100 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 60W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 175 g | |
| Price | — | $220 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (81/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (95/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim leads on camera score (34/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.