Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G leads — 39/100 vs 30/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4800); the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G is thinner (7.4mm vs 8.5mm).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4800 mAh
- Better camera (58/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G scores 9 points higher (39/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G leads (58/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (58/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | — | 450000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 750 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2100 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
- 6150 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (58/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G leads on camera score (58/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G is a better fit for everyday use.