Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Camon 15 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Camon 15 Pro (2020) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 14/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon 15 Pro doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Camon 15 Pro
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 199g vs 203g
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Camon 15 Pro, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 16 points higher (30/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 15 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 15 Pro is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 15 Pro (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Camon 15 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio P35 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 199111 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 476 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 828 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 10.0; HIOS 6.0 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.3×77.7×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 203 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon 15 Pro
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon 15 Pro
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 15 Pro
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 15 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 15 Pro is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 15 Pro (43/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 15 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 15 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Camon 15 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Camon 15 Pro — 14/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Camon 15 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 15 Pro leads on camera score (32/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Camon 15 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Camon 15 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.