Honor X40 GT Racing vs Samsung Galaxy M23
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy M23 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M23 leads — 31/100 vs 30/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M23 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Samsung Galaxy M23
- Faster charging: 66W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 198g vs 199g
- Better camera (28/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (52/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (89/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Samsung Galaxy M23, the Samsung Galaxy M23 scores 1 points higher (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M23 leads (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M23 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (28/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M23 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M23 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (89/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Samsung Galaxy M23 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 517683 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1882 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" TFT LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 165.5×77.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 198 g | |
| Price | — | $300 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M23
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M23
- 6.6" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M23
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M23 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (28/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M23 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M23 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (89/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy M23?
The Samsung Galaxy M23 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy M23?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Samsung Galaxy M23 — 31/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Samsung Galaxy M23?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M23 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.