Honor X40 GT Racing vs Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 23/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- Faster charging: 66W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global), the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 7 points higher (30/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Exynos 850 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 234339 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 300 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 836 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 165.4×76.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) — 23/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M13 (Global) is a better fit for everyday use.