Honor X40 GT Racing vs Realme Narzo 80 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Realme Narzo 80 Pro (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro leads — 35/100 vs 30/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Narzo 80 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro doesn't; the Realme Narzo 80 Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Realme Narzo 80 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Lighter: 179g vs 199g
- Higher performance (4/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Realme Narzo 80 Pro, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro scores 5 points higher (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro leads (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100. In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Realme Narzo 80 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 956756 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 162.8×74.9×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Realme Narzo 80 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme Narzo 80 Pro
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 80 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (60/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (76/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Realme Narzo 80 Pro?
The Realme Narzo 80 Pro edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 80 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Realme Narzo 80 Pro — 35/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Realme Narzo 80 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme Narzo 80 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.