Honor X40 GT Racing vs Realme Narzo 50A Prime
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Realme Narzo 50A Prime (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 17/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Narzo 50A Prime has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 50A Prime doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 189g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Realme Narzo 50A Prime, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 13 points higher (30/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50A Prime (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 50A Prime are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50A Prime is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc Tiger T612 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 200000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 360 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1250 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.4×75.6×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 50A Prime
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50A Prime (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 50A Prime are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50A Prime is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Realme Narzo 50A Prime?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Realme Narzo 50A Prime — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 50A Prime?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Realme Narzo 50A Prime — 17/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Realme Narzo 50A Prime?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme Narzo 50A Prime is a better fit for everyday use.