Honor X40 GT Racing vs Motorola Moto E22
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Motorola Moto E22 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 15/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4020); the main camera is 50 MP vs 16 MP; the Motorola Moto E22 is noticeably lighter (169g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Motorola Moto E22
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4020 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 2/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Lighter: 169g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (88/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Motorola Moto E22, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 15 points higher (30/100 vs 15/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 2/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E22 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E22 (27/100 vs 2/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E22 (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E22 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (88/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Motorola Moto E22 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G37 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 194025 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 198 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 868 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4020 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.6×74.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 169 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Moto E22
- Main: 16MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Moto E22
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Moto E22
- 4020 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E22 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E22 (27/100 vs 2/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E22 (43/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E22 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (88/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Moto E22?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto E22 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Motorola Moto E22?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Motorola Moto E22 — 15/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Moto E22?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Motorola Moto E22?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola Moto E22 is a better fit for everyday use.