Honor Win vs ZTE Blade A72 4G
The Honor Win (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Blade A72 4G (2022) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win leads — 78/100 vs 33/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the ZTE Blade A72 4G is noticeably lighter (214g vs 229g).
Honor Win
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (44/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (95/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 53/100)
- Lighter: 214g vs 229g
- Better portability (35/100 vs 30/100)
Comparing the Honor Win vs the ZTE Blade A72 4G, the Honor Win scores 45 points higher (78/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Win leads (44/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win leads (95/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (84/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (44/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (95/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).
| Specification | Honor Win | ZTE Blade A72 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 3873442 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1272x2800 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11, MiFavor 11 | |
| NFC | — | no | |
| Dimensions | — | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 214 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | — |
Honor Win
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Honor Win
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor Win
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A72 4G
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (84/100 vs 53/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (44/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (95/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).
Which is better: the Honor Win or the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Honor Win significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G by 45 points (78/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Win and the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Honor Win has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the ZTE Blade A72 4G — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win or the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Honor Win leads on camera score (44/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win over the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Honor Win is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The ZTE Blade A72 4G is a better fit for everyday use.