Honor Win Turbo vs Poco F9 Pro
The Honor Win Turbo (2026) runs on the Dimensity 8500 Elite, while the Poco F9 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $359 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 65/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win Turbo has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 6330); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,228,426 vs 2,268,740).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win Turbo
Poco F9 Pro
What makes Honor Win Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 6330 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $359 vs $699
- Overall rating 65/100
What makes Poco F9 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3228426 vs 2268740
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 206g vs 216g
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 76/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 82/100)
- Better portability (47/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win Turbo vs the Poco F9 Pro, the Poco F9 Pro scores 19 points higher (84/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (95/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (74/100 vs 34/100). Value score: Honor Win Turbo — 62/100, Poco F9 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (95/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (74/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Honor Win Turbo are nearly equal (47/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win Turbo | Poco F9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8500 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2268740 | 3228426 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 1156x2510 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 6330 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 8000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 157.5×75.3×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | 216 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $359 | $699 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco F9 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F9 Pro
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1156x2510
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win Turbo
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Poco F9 Pro
- 6330 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win Turbo and Poco F9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F9 Pro leads Honor Win Turbo by 29.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $340. Honor Win Turbo was $340 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (95/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (74/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the Honor Win Turbo are nearly equal (47/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win Turbo or the Poco F9 Pro?
The Poco F9 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor Win Turbo — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Win Turbo and the Poco F9 Pro?
The Honor Win Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Poco F9 Pro — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win Turbo or the Poco F9 Pro?
The Poco F9 Pro leads on camera score (74/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win Turbo or the Poco F9 Pro?
The Poco F9 Pro leads on performance (95/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win Turbo over the Poco F9 Pro?
The Honor Win Turbo is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.