Honor Win Turbo vs Poco F7 Ultra
The Honor Win Turbo (2026) runs on the Dimensity 8500 Elite, while the Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $359 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Ultra leads — 82/100 vs 65/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win Turbo has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 5300); the Poco F7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,932,885 vs 2,268,740).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win Turbo
Poco F7 Ultra
What makes Honor Win Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 5300 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $359 vs $500
- Overall rating 65/100
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2932885 vs 2268740
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Lighter: 212g vs 216g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (71/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 76/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win Turbo vs the Poco F7 Ultra, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 17 points higher (82/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 34/100). Value score: Honor Win Turbo — 62/100, Poco F7 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (71/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Honor Win Turbo are nearly equal (48/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win Turbo | Poco F7 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8500 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2268740 | 2932885 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5300 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 8000 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 216 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $359 | $500 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco F7 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win Turbo
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win Turbo and Poco F7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Ultra leads Honor Win Turbo by 22.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $141. Honor Win Turbo was $141 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (71/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Honor Win Turbo are nearly equal (48/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win Turbo or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor Win Turbo — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Win Turbo and the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Honor Win Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Poco F7 Ultra — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win Turbo or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on camera score (71/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win Turbo or the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on performance (90/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win Turbo over the Poco F7 Ultra?
The Honor Win Turbo is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.