Honor Win Turbo vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Honor Win Turbo (2026) runs on the Dimensity 8500 Elite, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $359 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 65/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win Turbo has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,268,740); the Honor Win Turbo is noticeably lighter (216g vs 285g).
Honor Win Turbo
Motorola Razr Fold
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 216g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $359 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (76/100 vs 71/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 81/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2268740
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1553
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6403
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 34/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Honor Win Turbo vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 21 points higher (86/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 34/100). Value score: Honor Win Turbo — 70/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (98/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win Turbo is a bit better (76/100 vs 71/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Honor Win Turbo | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8500 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2268740 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 8000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | — | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 216 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $359 | $1799 |
Honor Win Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Win Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Win Turbo
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Honor Win Turbo and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Honor Win Turbo by 42.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1440. Honor Win Turbo was $1440 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (98/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (91/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win Turbo is a bit better (76/100 vs 71/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Honor Win Turbo or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo by 21 points (86/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Win Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor Win Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win Turbo or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win Turbo or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win Turbo over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor Win Turbo is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.