Honor Win Turbo vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Honor Win Turbo (2026) runs on the Dimensity 8500 Elite, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $359 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 65/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win Turbo has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,268,740); the Honor Win Turbo is noticeably lighter (216g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win Turbo
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Honor Win Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Lighter: 216g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $359 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (76/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2268740
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 6405
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 34/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win Turbo vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 18 points higher (83/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 34/100). Value score: Honor Win Turbo — 62/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win Turbo is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win Turbo | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8500 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2268740 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 8000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | — | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 216 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $359 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win Turbo
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win Turbo and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Honor Win Turbo by 25.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1440. Honor Win Turbo was $1440 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (91/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win Turbo is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win Turbo or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Honor Win Turbo — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Win Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor Win Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win Turbo or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win Turbo or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win Turbo over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor Win Turbo is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.