Honor Win Turbo vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
The Honor Win Turbo (2026) runs on the Dimensity 8500 Elite, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $359 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 65/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win Turbo has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 2,268,740); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 216g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win Turbo
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
What makes Honor Win Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Cheaper at launch: $359 vs $1099
- Longer battery life (76/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 2268740
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6405
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 216g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 34/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win Turbo vs the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 11 points higher (76/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win Turbo leads (76/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Honor Win Turbo — 62/100, Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win Turbo notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (76/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (68/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win Turbo | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8500 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2268740 | 2962094 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 7.0" pOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 1224x2912 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 8000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 216 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $359 | $1099 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Win Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win Turbo
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win Turbo and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Honor Win Turbo by 23.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $740. Honor Win Turbo was $740 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (57/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win Turbo notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (76/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win Turbo (68/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win Turbo or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor Win Turbo — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Win Turbo and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor Win Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win Turbo or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win Turbo or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win Turbo over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor Win Turbo is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.