Honor Win RT vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

The Honor Win RT (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $384 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win RT leads — 76/100 vs 65/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win RT has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 4400); the Honor Win RT is faster in AnTuTu (3,475,149 vs 1,818,396); the Honor Win RT is noticeably lighter (229g vs 253g).

The Honor Win RT is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win RT
Performance 93
Display 94
Camera 45
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 90
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Performance 76
Display 78
Camera 63
Battery 39
Portability 52
Value for money 34
What makes Honor Win RT better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3475149 vs 1818396
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 10000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 229g vs 253g
  • Cheaper at launch: $384 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 76/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 better?

  • Better camera (63/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Win RT vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5, the Honor Win RT scores 11 points higher (76/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT leads (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 leads (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT leads (80/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Honor Win RT — 90/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 — 34/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 notably outperforms the Honor Win RT (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a bit better (52/100 vs 38/100).

Honor Win RT: The Honor Win RT is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Win RT Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3475149 1818396
Geekbench Single 3041 2004
Geekbench Multi 9494 5311
Display 6.8" LTPS AMOLED 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1272x2800 2176x1812
Refresh rate 185 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 10000 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 128
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / MagicOS 10 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX8
Dimensions 163.1×76.6×8.3 mm 154.9×129.9×6.1 mm
Weight 229 g 253 g
Launch price $384 $1799
Camera comparison
Honor Win RT
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 50MP
45
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Honor Win RT
  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1272x2800
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
94
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2176x1812
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Battery and charging
Honor Win RT
  • 10000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Win RT and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Win RT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3475149 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
65/100 -91.1%
1818396 AnTuTu

Honor Win RT leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 by 91.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Win RT
$384
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
$1799

Launch price difference: $1415. Honor Win RT was $1415 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (93/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 notably outperforms the Honor Win RT (63/100 vs 45/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (80/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a bit better (52/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Honor Win RT is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Win RT and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Honor Win RT has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 leads on camera score (63/100 vs 45/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Honor Win RT leads on performance (93/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Honor Win RT over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Honor Win RT is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a better fit for active users.