Honor Win RT vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5

The Honor Win RT (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $384 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win RT leads — 76/100 vs 64/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win RT has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 12 MP; the Honor Win RT is faster in AnTuTu (3,475,149 vs 1,743,099); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 229g).

The Honor Win RT is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win RT
Performance 93
Display 94
Camera 45
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 90
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
Performance 75
Display 82
Camera 63
Battery 24
Portability 78
Value for money 40
What makes Honor Win RT better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3475149 vs 1743099
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 10000 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $384 vs $999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 75/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 better?
  • Lighter: 187g vs 229g

  • Better camera (63/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better portability (78/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Win RT vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5, the Honor Win RT scores 12 points higher (76/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT leads (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 leads (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT leads (80/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Honor Win RT — 90/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — 40/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 notably outperforms the Honor Win RT (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (80/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 significantly outperforms the Honor Win RT (78/100 vs 38/100).

Honor Win RT: The Honor Win RT is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Win RT Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3475149 1743099
Geekbench Single 3041 2004
Geekbench Multi 9494 5311
Display 6.8" LTPS AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1272x2800 2640x1080
Refresh rate 185 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 10000 mAh 3700 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 127
Main camera 50 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 12 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / MagicOS 10 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits 1750 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX8
Dimensions 163.1×76.6×8.3 mm 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm
Weight 229 g 187 g
Launch price $384 $999
Camera comparison
Honor Win RT
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 50MP
45
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Honor Win RT
  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1272x2800
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
94
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Battery and charging
Honor Win RT
  • 10000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
24
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Win RT and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Win RT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3475149 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
64/100 -99.4%
1743099 AnTuTu

Honor Win RT leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 by 99.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Win RT
$384
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
$999

Launch price difference: $615. Honor Win RT was $615 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (93/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 notably outperforms the Honor Win RT (63/100 vs 45/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 (80/100 vs 24/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 significantly outperforms the Honor Win RT (78/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The Honor Win RT is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Win RT and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The Honor Win RT has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 leads on camera score (63/100 vs 45/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Win RT or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The Honor Win RT leads on performance (93/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Honor Win RT over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5?

The Honor Win RT is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 is a better fit for active users.