Honor Turbo vs Nokia 4.2

The Honor Turbo (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, while the Nokia 4.2 (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 439; launch prices were $215 and $169. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Turbo leads — 58/100 vs 18/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Turbo has the bigger battery (8560 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (1,000,207 vs 193,115); the Nokia 4.2 is noticeably lighter (161g vs 196g).

The Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 by 40 points (58/100 vs 18/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Turbo

Performance 58
Display 82
Camera 34
Battery 74
Portability 64
Value for money 74

Nokia 4.2

Performance 12
Display 34
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 78
Value for money 6

What makes Honor Turbo better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1000207 vs 193115
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1087 vs 199
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3148 vs 795
  • Bigger battery: 8560 vs 3000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 5W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (58/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better camera (34/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (74/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (82/100 vs 34/100)

What makes Nokia 4.2 better?

  • Lighter: 161g vs 196g
  • Cheaper at launch: $169 vs $215

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 64/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Turbo vs the Nokia 4.2, the Honor Turbo scores 40 points higher (58/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Turbo leads (58/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Turbo leads (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo leads (74/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Honor Turbo — 74/100, Nokia 4.2 — 6/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (58/100 vs 12/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (82/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (74/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia 4.2 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Turbo Nokia 4.2
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
AnTuTu 1000207 193115
Geekbench Single 1087 199
Geekbench Multi 3148 795
Display 6.8" AMOLED 5.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 1200x2640 1520x720
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 8560 mAh 3000 mAh
Charging 80W 5W
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 0 MP
Front camera 16 MP 8 MP
RAM 8GB 2GB / 3GB
Storage 256GB 16GB / 32GB
OS Android 16 Android 9
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 —
Dimensions 161.9×76.1×7.8 mm 149.0×71.3×8.4 mm
Weight 196 g 161 g
Launch price $215 $169

Camera comparison

Honor Turbo

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 16MP
34
camera

Nokia 4.2

  • Main: 13MP f/2.2
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Honor Turbo

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Nokia 4.2

  • 5.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1520x720
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
34
display

Battery and charging

Honor Turbo

  • 8560 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
74
battery

Nokia 4.2

  • 3000 mAh
  • Wired: 5W
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Turbo and Nokia 4.2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Turbo Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
58/100
1000207 AnTuTu
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
18/100 -417.9%
193115 AnTuTu

Honor Turbo leads Nokia 4.2 by 417.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Turbo

$215

Nokia 4.2

$169

Launch price difference: $46. Nokia 4.2 was $46 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (58/100 vs 12/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (82/100 vs 34/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (34/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 (74/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia 4.2 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Turbo or the Nokia 4.2?

The Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Nokia 4.2 by 40 points (58/100 vs 18/100).

What is the rating of the Honor Turbo and the Nokia 4.2?

The Honor Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Nokia 4.2 — 18/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Turbo or the Nokia 4.2?

The Honor Turbo leads on camera score (34/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Turbo or the Nokia 4.2?

The Honor Turbo leads on performance (58/100 vs 12/100).

Should you choose the Honor Turbo over the Nokia 4.2?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Honor Turbo (74/100 vs 15/100).