Honor Turbo vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Honor Turbo (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $215 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 58/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Turbo has the bigger battery (8560 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,000,207); the Honor Turbo is noticeably lighter (196g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Turbo
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Honor Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 8560 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Lighter: 196g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $215 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1000207
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1087
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3148
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Turbo vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 25 points higher (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 34/100). Value score: Honor Turbo — 74/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Turbo (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Turbo (91/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Turbo | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1000207 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1087 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3148 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8560 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×76.1×7.8 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $215 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Honor Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Turbo
- 8560 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Turbo and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Honor Turbo by 67.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1584. Honor Turbo was $1584 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Turbo (90/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Turbo (91/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Turbo or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Turbo by 25 points (83/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Turbo and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Turbo or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Turbo or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Turbo over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.