Honor Turbo vs Lava Blaze Amoled 2
The Honor Turbo (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, while the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060; launch prices were $215 and $139. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Turbo leads — 58/100 vs 50/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Turbo has the bigger battery (8560 mAh vs 5000); the Honor Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (1,000,207 vs 693,978); the Honor Turbo has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 196g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Turbo
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
What makes Honor Turbo better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1000207 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 1087 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3148 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 8560 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Higher performance (58/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (34/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 196g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $215
- Better portability (79/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Turbo vs the Lava Blaze Amoled 2, the Honor Turbo scores 8 points higher (58/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo leads (74/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Honor Turbo — 74/100, Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Turbo and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (74/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Honor Turbo (79/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Turbo | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | |
| AnTuTu | 1000207 | 693978 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1087 | 1037 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3148 | 2386 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8560 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×76.1×7.8 mm | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 174 g | |
| Launch price | $215 | $139 |
Camera comparison
Honor Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Turbo
- 8560 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Turbo and Lava Blaze Amoled 2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Turbo leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 44.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $76. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $76 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Turbo and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (74/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Honor Turbo (79/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Turbo or the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Honor Turbo edges out the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Turbo and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Honor Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 50/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Turbo or the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Honor Turbo leads on performance (58/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Honor Turbo over the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.