Honor Play 9A vs Vivo Y32t
The Honor Play 9A (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 25/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 199,111).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play 9A
Vivo Y32t
What makes Honor Play 9A better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 476 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 828 vs 779
- Better display (40/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 199111
- Lighter: 179g vs 185g
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 19/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play 9A vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 3 points higher (28/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Honor Play 9A are nearly equal (20/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Play 9A and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play 9A | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P35 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 199111 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 476 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 828 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.3" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10.0 (AOSP + HMS); Magic UI 3.0 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 159.1×74.1×9.0 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Play 9A
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Play 9A
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Honor Play 9A
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play 9A and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Honor Play 9A by 34.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Honor Play 9A are nearly equal (20/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Play 9A and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play 9A or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Honor Play 9A by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Play 9A and the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor Play 9A has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Should you choose the Honor Play 9A over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 57/100).