Honor Play 40 vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Honor Play 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 35/100 (a 48-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Play 40 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 477,542); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor Play 40 doesn't; the Honor Play 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Play 40
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Honor Play 40 better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 188g vs 285g
- Better portability (62/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 1816
- Faster charging: 68W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Play 40 vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 48 points higher (83/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 (90/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor Play 40 (68/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Play 40 is a bit better (62/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Play 40 | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.6" TFT LCD | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.1×8.4 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Honor Play 40
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Play 40
- 6.6" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Play 40
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Play 40 and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Honor Play 40 by 84.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Play 40
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 (90/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 (81/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 (91/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor Play 40 (68/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Play 40 is a bit better (62/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Play 40 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Honor Play 40 by 48 points (83/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Play 40 and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor Play 40 has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Play 40 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Play 40 or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Honor Play 40 over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.