Honor Play 3e vs Nokia C5 Endi

The Honor Play 3e (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Nokia C5 Endi (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Play 3e leads — 19/100 vs 18/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia C5 Endi has the bigger battery (4000 mAh vs 3020); the Honor Play 3e is noticeably lighter (146g vs 200g).

The Honor Play 3e edges out the Nokia C5 Endi by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Play 3e

Performance 10
Display 42
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 78
Value for money —

Nokia C5 Endi

Performance 10
Display 39
Camera 12
Battery 22
Portability 50
Value for money —

What makes Honor Play 3e better?

  • Lighter: 146g vs 200g

  • Better display (42/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better portability (78/100 vs 50/100)

What makes Nokia C5 Endi better?

  • Bigger battery: 4000 vs 3020 mAh

  • Better camera (12/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (22/100 vs 15/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Play 3e vs the Nokia C5 Endi, the Honor Play 3e scores 1 points higher (19/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "display" category, the Honor Play 3e and the Nokia C5 Endi are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia C5 Endi and the Honor Play 3e are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia C5 Endi is a bit better (22/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Play 3e notably outperforms the Nokia C5 Endi (78/100 vs 50/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Play 3e Nokia C5 Endi
Processor MediaTek Helio P22 MediaTek Helio P22
AnTuTu 177554 177554
Geekbench Single 233 233
Geekbench Multi 723 723
Display 5.7" IPS LCD 6.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1520 720x1600
Refresh rate — —
Battery 3020 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging — 10W
Main camera 13 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 5 MP
Front camera 5 MP 8 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 3GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB 64GB
OS Android 9.0 (Pie); EMUI 9.1 Android 10
NFC no no
Dimensions 147.1×70.8×8.5 mm 171.7×76.7×8.9 mm
Weight 146 g 200 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Honor Play 3e

  • Main: 13MP f/1.8
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Nokia C5 Endi

  • Main: 13MP
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 8MP
12
camera

Display comparison

Honor Play 3e

  • 5.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1520
  • Refresh rate: —
42
display

Nokia C5 Endi

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

Battery and charging

Honor Play 3e

  • 3020 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

Nokia C5 Endi

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Play 3e and Nokia C5 Endi, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Play 3e MediaTek Helio P22
19/100
177554 AnTuTu
Nokia C5 Endi MediaTek Helio P22
18/100
177554 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Play 3e and the Nokia C5 Endi are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia C5 Endi and the Honor Play 3e are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Nokia C5 Endi is a bit better (22/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor Play 3e notably outperforms the Nokia C5 Endi (78/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Play 3e or the Nokia C5 Endi?

The Honor Play 3e edges out the Nokia C5 Endi by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor Play 3e and the Nokia C5 Endi?

The Honor Play 3e has a MobileRank rating of 19/100, the Nokia C5 Endi — 18/100.

Should you choose the Honor Play 3e over the Nokia C5 Endi?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Honor Play 3e (78/100 vs 50/100).