Honor Magic9 Super vs Vivo X200 Pro Mini
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 82/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 5700); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 2,779,129); the Vivo X200 Pro Mini is noticeably lighter (189g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 2779129
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2797
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 8767
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5700 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 89/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 75/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Pro Mini better?
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Lighter: 189g vs 227g
- Better display (87/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Vivo X200 Pro Mini, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 5 points higher (87/100 vs 82/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini and the Honor Magic9 Super are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (63/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 2779129 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 2797 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 8767 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | $750 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- 5700 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:58 hrs, total 28:40 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Vivo X200 Pro Mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Vivo X200 Pro Mini by 54.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic9 Super
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini and the Honor Magic9 Super are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (91/100 vs 75/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (63/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Honor Magic9 Super edges out the Vivo X200 Pro Mini by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini — 82/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X200 Pro Mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.