Honor Magic9 Super vs Vivo X200 FE
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X200 FE (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 74/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 2,140,421); the Vivo X200 FE is noticeably lighter (186g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Vivo X200 FE
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 2140421
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2249
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 7352
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 6500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Vivo X200 FE better?
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Lighter: 186g vs 227g
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (67/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Vivo X200 FE, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 13 points higher (87/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Vivo X200 FE (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 FE and the Honor Magic9 Super are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Vivo X200 FE (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 FE notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (67/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Vivo X200 FE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 2140421 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 2249 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 7352 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 2640x1216 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 186 g | |
| Launch price | — | $649 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 FE
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 FE
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2640x1216
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 FE
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Vivo X200 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Vivo X200 FE by 100.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic9 Super
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Vivo X200 FE (99/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 FE and the Honor Magic9 Super are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Vivo X200 FE (91/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 FE notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (67/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Vivo X200 FE?
The Honor Magic9 Super is noticeably better than the Vivo X200 FE — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Vivo X200 FE?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X200 FE — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Vivo X200 FE?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Vivo X200 FE?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Vivo X200 FE?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X200 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users.