Honor Magic9 Super vs Tecno Camon Slim 5G
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7300e. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 59/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 879,714); the Tecno Camon Slim 5G is thinner (6.4mm vs 8.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Tecno Camon Slim 5G
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1001
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2918
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Tecno Camon Slim 5G better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (92/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Tecno Camon Slim 5G, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 28 points higher (87/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (100/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Tecno Camon Slim 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 7300e | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1001 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 2918 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 162.6×77.3×6.4 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | $330 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon Slim 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon Slim 5G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon Slim 5G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Tecno Camon Slim 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Tecno Camon Slim 5G by 387.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic9 Super
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (78/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (91/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (100/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G by 28 points (87/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G — 59/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.