Honor Magic V6 vs Tecno Camon Slim 5G
The Honor Magic V6 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7300e; launch prices were $1599 and $330. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic V6 leads — 82/100 vs 59/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic V6 has the bigger battery (6660 mAh vs 6500); the Honor Magic V6 is faster in AnTuTu (4,166,339 vs 879,714); the Honor Magic V6 is thinner (4.0mm vs 6.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic V6
Tecno Camon Slim 5G
What makes Honor Magic V6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4166339 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 6660 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (69/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Tecno Camon Slim 5G better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $330 vs $1599
- Better display (92/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic V6 vs the Tecno Camon Slim 5G, the Honor Magic V6 scores 23 points higher (82/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (69/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (78/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Honor Magic V6 — 72/100, Tecno Camon Slim 5G — 54/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V6 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (69/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (78/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V6 (100/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic V6 | Tecno Camon Slim 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 7300e | |
| AnTuTu | 4166339 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2848x2076 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6660 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 40 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 156.7×145.6×4.0 mm | 162.6×77.3×6.4 mm | |
| Weight | 236 g | — | |
| Launch price | $1599 | $330 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic V6
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 40MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon Slim 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic V6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2848x2076
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon Slim 5G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic V6
- 6660 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 66W
Tecno Camon Slim 5G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic V6 and Tecno Camon Slim 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic V6 leads Tecno Camon Slim 5G by 373.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1269. Tecno Camon Slim 5G was $1269 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (98/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V6 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (69/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G (78/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V6 (100/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic V6 or the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim 5G by 23 points (82/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic V6 and the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic V6 has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Tecno Camon Slim 5G — 59/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic V6 or the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic V6 leads on camera score (69/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V6 or the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic V6 leads on performance (98/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic V6 over the Tecno Camon Slim 5G?
The Honor Magic V6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.