Honor Magic9 Super vs Tecno Camon 50 Slim
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 53/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is noticeably lighter (175g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 60W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Slim better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 175g vs 227g
- Better display (93/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (84/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Tecno Camon 50 Slim, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 34 points higher (87/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (84/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Tecno Camon 50 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 750 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 2100 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | — | |
| Weight | 227 g | 175 g | |
| Launch price | — | $220 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless charging: no data
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic9 Super
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (99/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (78/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (91/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (84/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim by 34 points (87/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim — 53/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.