Honor Magic V6 vs Tecno Camon 50 Slim
The Honor Magic V6 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate; launch prices were $1599 and $220. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic V6 leads — 82/100 vs 53/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic V6 has the bigger battery (6660 mAh vs 5600); the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is noticeably lighter (175g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic V6
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
What makes Honor Magic V6 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 6660 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 60W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (69/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Slim better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 175g vs 236g
- Cheaper at launch: $220 vs $1599
- Better display (93/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (84/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic V6 vs the Tecno Camon 50 Slim, the Honor Magic V6 scores 29 points higher (82/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (98/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (69/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (78/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Honor Magic V6 — 72/100, Tecno Camon 50 Slim — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (98/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (69/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V6 (84/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic V6 | Tecno Camon 50 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 4166339 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 750 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 2100 | |
| Display | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2848x2076 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6660 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 40 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 156.7×145.6×4.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 236 g | 175 g | |
| Launch price | $1599 | $220 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic V6
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 40MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic V6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2848x2076
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic V6
- 6660 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 66W
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless charging: no data
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1379. Tecno Camon 50 Slim was $1379 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (98/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (69/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Honor Magic V6 (84/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic V6 or the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim by 29 points (82/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic V6 and the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic V6 has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim — 53/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic V6 or the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic V6 leads on camera score (69/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V6 or the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic V6 leads on performance (98/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic V6 over the Tecno Camon 50 Slim?
The Honor Magic V6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.