Honor Magic7 vs ZTE Blade A35
The Honor Magic7 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 leads — 78/100 vs 36/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 has the bigger battery (5650 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Honor Magic7 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A35 doesn't.
Honor Magic7
ZTE Blade A35
- Bigger battery: 5650 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (56/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 46/100)
- Overall rating 36/100
Comparing the Honor Magic7 vs the ZTE Blade A35, the Honor Magic7 scores 42 points higher (78/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (56/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (84/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (56/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2800x1256 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5650 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×75.8×8.0 mm | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Launch price | $550 | — |
Honor Magic7
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Honor Magic7
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1256
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor Magic7
- 5650 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Blade A35
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (84/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (56/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (81/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (60/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 by 42 points (78/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Magic7 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Magic7 leads on camera score (56/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Honor Magic7 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A35 is a better fit for everyday use.