Honor Magic7 Pro vs Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 79/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5270); the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 3,014,433); the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) is noticeably lighter (191g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7 Pro
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 9119
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (79/100 vs 64/100)
What makes Vivo X300 FE (Russia) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 3014433
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5270 mAh
- Lighter: 191g vs 223g
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 FE (Russia), the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 3 points higher (82/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (79/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) (79/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (64/100 vs 36/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | Vivo X300 FE (Russia) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3014433 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3057 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9302 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5270 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 148 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 191 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5270 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Vivo X300 FE (Russia), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 FE (Russia) leads Honor Magic7 Pro by 1.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) (79/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (64/100 vs 36/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X300 FE (Russia)?
The Honor Magic7 Pro edges out the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X300 FE (Russia)?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X300 FE (Russia)?
The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on camera score (79/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Vivo X300 FE (Russia)?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 FE (Russia) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.