Honor Magic7 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1099 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 82/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5270); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 3,014,433); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X200 Ultra has the stronger camera (167 vs 148).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Lighter: 223g vs 229g
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (36/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 3014433
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3057
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9302
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5270 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $1099
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 79/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 4 points higher (86/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 79/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 74/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (36/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3014433 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3057 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9302 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5270 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 148 | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5270 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Honor Magic7 Pro by 2.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $210. Vivo X200 Ultra was $210 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (36/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Honor Magic7 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 79/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.