Honor Magic7 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $899 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 85/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5850); the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 3,092,340).
Honor Magic7 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 3092340
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 40W
- Lighter: 223g vs 229g
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (36/100 vs 34/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5850 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $899
- Better camera (93/100 vs 87/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 1 points higher (86/100 vs 85/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 82/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (36/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5850 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $889 |
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5850 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 Pro leads Vivo X200 Ultra by 0.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $10. Vivo X200 Ultra was $10 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (36/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Honor Magic7 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 85/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 87/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.