Honor Magic7 Pro vs OPPO Reno16 Pro

The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super; launch prices were $1099 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 82/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5270); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 3,014,433); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 223g).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Honor Magic7 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic7 Pro

Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 74

OPPO Reno16 Pro

Performance 82
Display 95
Camera 94
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 80

What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1555
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 6405
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 82/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 66/100)

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 3014433
  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5270 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 188g vs 223g
  • Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1099

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 36/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 1 points higher (83/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 66/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 74/100, OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (64/100 vs 36/100).

Honor Magic7 Pro: The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
OPPO Reno16 Pro: The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic7 Pro OPPO Reno16 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
AnTuTu 3014433 3079298
Geekbench Single 3057 1555
Geekbench Multi 9302 6405
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.3" AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1280 1216x2640
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5270 mAh 6700 mAh
Charging 100W 80W
Wireless charging 80W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 148 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP69
Dimensions 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm
Weight 223 g 188 g
Launch price $1099 $600

Camera comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
95
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and OPPO Reno16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
3014433 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
83/100 +2.1%
3079298 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Honor Magic7 Pro by 2.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Magic7 Pro

$1099

OPPO Reno16 Pro

$600

Launch price difference: $499. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $499 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (94/100 vs 79/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (64/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Honor Magic7 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro — 83/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 79/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 82/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the OPPO Reno16 Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.