Honor Magic7 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 66/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Pro has the bigger battery (5270 mAh vs 4000); the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,433 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (189g vs 223g).

The Honor Magic7 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic7 Pro

Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 74

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Performance 75
Display 91
Camera 58
Battery 36
Portability 75
Value for money —

What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014433 vs 1797821
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1923
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 5179
  • Bigger battery: 5270 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (79/100 vs 58/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 36/100)

What makes Motorola Razr 50 Ultra better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 223g

  • Better display (91/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (75/100 vs 36/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 16 points higher (82/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (79/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (79/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (75/100 vs 36/100).

Honor Magic7 Pro: The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic7 Pro Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
AnTuTu 3014433 1797821
Geekbench Single 3057 1923
Geekbench Multi 9302 5179
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1280 1080x2640
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 5270 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging 100W 45W
Wireless charging 80W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 148 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IPX8
Dimensions 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm
Weight 223 g 189 g
Launch price $1099 —

Camera comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
58
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

  • 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2640
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
91
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
36
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
3014433 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
66/100 -67.7%
1797821 AnTuTu

Honor Magic7 Pro leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 67.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Magic7 Pro

$1099

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (79/100 vs 58/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 36/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (75/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic7 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on camera score (79/100 vs 58/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users.