Honor Magic7 Pro vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 82/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Pro has the bigger battery (5270 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 3,014,433); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 148); the Honor Magic7 Pro is noticeably lighter (223g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Honor Magic7 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic7 Pro

Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 74

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 2833
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 9119
  • Bigger battery: 5270 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 50W
  • Lighter: 223g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 3014433

  • Better camera (91/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 36/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 1 points higher (83/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 74/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (52/100 vs 36/100).

Honor Magic7 Pro: The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic7 Pro Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu 3014433 3057215
Geekbench Single 3057 2833
Geekbench Multi 9302 9119
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1280 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5270 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 68W
Wireless charging 80W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 148 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 10 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IPX9
Dimensions 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 223 g 285 g
Launch price $1099 $1799

Camera comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
3014433 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100 +1.4%
3057215 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Honor Magic7 Pro by 1.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Magic7 Pro

$1099

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Launch price difference: $700. Honor Magic7 Pro was $700 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (52/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Honor Magic7 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 79/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.