Honor Magic4 Ultimate vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Honor Magic4 Ultimate (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 70/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,294,871); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 147); the Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably lighter (226g vs 242g).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor Magic4 Ultimate — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Performance 68
Display 85
Camera 78
Battery 66
Portability 20
Value for money —

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Honor Magic4 Ultimate better?

  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W

  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1294871
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1662
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4188
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4600 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 226g vs 242g

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (43/100 vs 20/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic4 Ultimate vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 18 points higher (88/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (43/100 vs 20/100).

Honor Magic4 Ultimate: The Honor Magic4 Ultimate is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic4 Ultimate Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1294871 3326259
Geekbench Single 1662 3293
Geekbench Multi 4188 10243
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1312x2848 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 100W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 147 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 64 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.6×74.7×11.4 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 242 g 226 g
Launch price — $899

Camera comparison

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 12MP
78
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1312x2848
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
66
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic4 Ultimate and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic4 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
70/100
1294871 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +61.1%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor Magic4 Ultimate by 61.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Magic4 Ultimate

Price unknown

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (94/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (96/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (81/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (43/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic4 Ultimate or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor Magic4 Ultimate — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 Ultimate and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Honor Magic4 Ultimate has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 Ultimate or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic4 Ultimate or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic4 Ultimate over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Honor Magic4 Ultimate is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.