Honor Magic4 Lite vs Poco C40
The Honor Magic4 Lite (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic4 Lite leads — 30/100 vs 11/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C40 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 48 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor Magic4 Lite is noticeably lighter (189g vs 204g).
Honor Magic4 Lite
Poco C40
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 204g
- Better camera (26/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 45/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic4 Lite vs the Poco C40, the Honor Magic4 Lite scores 19 points higher (30/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite leads (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite notably outperforms the Poco C40 (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 and the Honor Magic4 Lite are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite notably outperforms the Poco C40 (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor Magic4 Lite | Poco C40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | JLQ | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1650 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.1 mm | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 204 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor Magic4 Lite
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Honor Magic4 Lite
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Honor Magic4 Lite
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite notably outperforms the Poco C40 (26/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 and the Honor Magic4 Lite are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite notably outperforms the Poco C40 (63/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor Magic4 Lite or the Poco C40?
The Honor Magic4 Lite is noticeably better than the Poco C40 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 Lite and the Poco C40?
The Honor Magic4 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco C40 — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 Lite or the Poco C40?
The Honor Magic4 Lite leads on camera score (26/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic4 Lite over the Poco C40?
The Honor Magic4 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use.