Honor Magic4 Lite vs Nokia XR30

The Honor Magic4 Lite (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. Both devices score the same overall rating of 46/100. Key differences: the Honor Magic4 Lite has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 48 MP vs 64 MP.

Both devices scored the same rating of 46/100 — the choice comes down to your priorities.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic4 Lite

Performance 46
Display 65
Camera 31
Battery 49
Portability 64
Value for money —

Nokia XR30

Performance 46
Display 66
Camera 43
Battery 37
Portability —
Value for money —

What makes Honor Magic4 Lite better?

  • Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 66W vs 33W

  • Longer battery life (49/100 vs 37/100)

What makes Nokia XR30 better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 48MP

  • Better camera (43/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (66/100 vs 65/100)

Comparison verdict

The Honor Magic4 Lite and the Nokia XR30 received the same MobileRank rating — 46/100. In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite leads (49/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100. In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Honor Magic4 Lite are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite is a bit better (49/100 vs 37/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic4 Lite Nokia XR30
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
AnTuTu 592015 592015
Geekbench Single 905 905
Geekbench Multi 2101 2101
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.7"
Resolution 1080x2388 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz —
Battery 4800 mAh 4600 mAh
Charging 66W 33W
Main camera 48 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 6GB
Storage 128GB 128GB
OS Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 Android 13
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 166.1×75.8×8.1 mm —
Weight 189 g —
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Honor Magic4 Lite

  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera

Nokia XR30

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic4 Lite

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2388
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
65
display

Nokia XR30

  • 6.7"
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
66
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic4 Lite

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • No wireless charging
49
battery

Nokia XR30

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic4 Lite and Nokia XR30, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
46/100
592015 AnTuTu
Nokia XR30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
46/100
592015 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Honor Magic4 Lite are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Lite is a bit better (49/100 vs 37/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic4 Lite or the Nokia XR30?

Both devices scored 46/100. They are identical on performance — 46/100 for both. The clearest difference is camera: better on the Nokia XR30 (43/100 vs 31/100).

What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 Lite and the Nokia XR30?

The Honor Magic4 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Nokia XR30 — 46/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 Lite or the Nokia XR30?

The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 31/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic4 Lite over the Nokia XR30?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Nokia XR30 (43/100 vs 31/100).