Honor Magic Vs3 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor Magic Vs3 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 68/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,757,044); the Honor Magic Vs3 is noticeably lighter (229g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic Vs3
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor Magic Vs3 better?
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 229g vs 309g
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (58/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic Vs3 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 1 points higher (69/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Honor Magic Vs3 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic Vs3 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1757044 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2156x2344 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 40 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8.0.1 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 156.8×145.2×4.7 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic Vs3
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 40MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic Vs3
- 7.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2156x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic Vs3
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic Vs3 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor Magic Vs3 by 40.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic Vs3
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Honor Magic Vs3 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic Vs3 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Honor Magic Vs3 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic Vs3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic Vs3 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic Vs3 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic Vs3 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic Vs3 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.