Honor Magic Vs3 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Honor Magic Vs3 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 71/100 vs 67/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic Vs3 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,754,213); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (199g vs 229g).
Honor Magic Vs3
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Better camera (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 45/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1754213
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 5311
- Lighter: 199g vs 229g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 75/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic Vs3 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 4 points higher (71/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 leads (68/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Magic Vs3 (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Honor Magic Vs3 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (68/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Magic Vs3 (76/100 vs 58/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic Vs3 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1754213 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 9494 | |
| Display | 7.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | |
| Resolution | 2156x2344 | 1828x2584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 40 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8.0.1 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 156.8×145.2×4.7 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Honor Magic Vs3
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 40MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Honor Magic Vs3
- 7.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2156x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1828x2584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic Vs3
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic Vs3 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Honor Magic Vs3 by 43.8% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Magic Vs3 (92/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Honor Magic Vs3 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic Vs3 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (68/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Magic Vs3 (76/100 vs 58/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic Vs3 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide edges out the Honor Magic Vs3 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic Vs3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor Magic Vs3 has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic Vs3 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (92/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic Vs3 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor Magic Vs3 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.