Honor Magic 7 Pro vs Infinix GT 50 Pro

The Honor Magic 7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate; estimated prices are $1099 and $349. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 65/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5270); the Honor Magic 7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,018,146 vs 2,137,843); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 223g).

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is noticeably better than the Infinix GT 50 Pro — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic 7 Pro
Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 76
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Performance 77
Display 92
Camera 31
Battery 69
Portability 60
Value for money 70
What makes Honor Magic 7 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3018146 vs 2137843
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 6100
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better camera (79/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better value for money (76/100 vs 70/100)
What makes Infinix GT 50 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5270 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 200g vs 223g
  • Cheaper: $349 vs $1099

  • Better display (92/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (60/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic 7 Pro vs the Infinix GT 50 Pro, the Honor Magic 7 Pro scores 17 points higher (82/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads (91/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads (79/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (79/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (60/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100).

Honor Magic 7 Pro: The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Infinix GT 50 Pro: The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Magic 7 Pro Infinix GT 50 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate
AnTuTu 3018146 2137843
Geekbench Single 3057 1579
Geekbench Multi 9302 6100
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1280 1208x2644
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5270 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 100W 45W
Wireless charging 80W 30W
DXOMark (camera) 148
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP64
Dimensions 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm
Weight 223 g 200 g
Price $1099 $349
Camera comparison
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera
Infinix GT 50 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera
Display comparison
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Infinix GT 50 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
92
display
Battery and charging
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery
Infinix GT 50 Pro
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 30W
69
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic 7 Pro and Infinix GT 50 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
3018146 AnTuTu
Infinix GT 50 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate
65/100 -41.2%
2137843 AnTuTu

Honor Magic 7 Pro leads Infinix GT 50 Pro by 41.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Honor Magic 7 Pro
$1099
Infinix GT 50 Pro
$349

Price difference: $750. Infinix GT 50 Pro is cheaper by $750.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (79/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (60/100 vs 36/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the Infinix GT 50 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is noticeably better than the Infinix GT 50 Pro — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the Infinix GT 50 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Infinix GT 50 Pro — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the Infinix GT 50 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro leads on camera score (79/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the Infinix GT 50 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic 7 Pro over the Infinix GT 50 Pro?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users.