Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate; launch prices were $1090 and $349. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads — 88/100 vs 65/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 6500); the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,959,760); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 239g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design
Infinix GT 50 Pro
What makes Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1959760
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 30W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 69/100)
What makes Infinix GT 50 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 200g vs 239g
- Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $1090
- Better display (92/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 30/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design vs the Infinix GT 50 Pro, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design scores 23 points higher (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads (98/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads (92/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design — 86/100, Infinix GT 50 Pro — 64/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (98/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design (60/100 vs 30/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design | Infinix GT 50 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3950082 | 1959760 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1579 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 6100 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1256x2808 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB / 24GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.0×8.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 239 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $1090 | $349 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design
- 6.7" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1256x2808
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 80W
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design and Infinix GT 50 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads Infinix GT 50 Pro by 101.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $741. Infinix GT 50 Pro was $741 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (98/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (87/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (92/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design (60/100 vs 30/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design or the Infinix GT 50 Pro?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 23 points (88/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design and the Infinix GT 50 Pro?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Infinix GT 50 Pro — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design or the Infinix GT 50 Pro?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads on camera score (87/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design or the Infinix GT 50 Pro?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design leads on performance (98/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design over the Infinix GT 50 Pro?
The Honor Magic8 RSR Porsche Design is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users.