Honor GT Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

The Honor GT Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $485 and $1199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor GT Pro leads — 83/100 vs 70/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Honor GT Pro has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor GT Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,280,245 vs 1,684,869); the Honor GT Pro is noticeably lighter (212g vs 234g).

The Honor GT Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor GT Pro

Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 81
Battery 70
Portability 46
Value for money 88

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

Performance 75
Display 88
Camera 73
Battery 56
Portability 29
Value for money 50

What makes Honor GT Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3280245 vs 1684869
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 212g vs 234g
  • Cheaper at launch: $485 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (70/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better portability (46/100 vs 29/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Overall rating 70/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor GT Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, the Honor GT Pro scores 13 points higher (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor GT Pro leads (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor GT Pro leads (70/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Honor GT Pro — 88/100, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor GT Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor GT Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (46/100 vs 29/100).

Honor GT Pro: The Honor GT Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor GT Pro Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3280245 1684869
Geekbench Single 3013 2004
Geekbench Multi 9287 5311
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2800 1440x3088
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7200 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 90W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 140
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 10 MP
Front camera 50 MP 12 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits 1750 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 162.1×75.7×8.6 mm 163.4×78.1×8.9 mm
Weight 212 g 234 g
Launch price $485 $1199

Camera comparison

Honor GT Pro

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera

Display comparison

Honor GT Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3088
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Battery and charging

Honor GT Pro

  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
70
battery

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor GT Pro and Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor GT Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
83/100
3280245 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
70/100 -94.7%
1684869 AnTuTu

Honor GT Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra by 94.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor GT Pro

$485

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

$1199

Launch price difference: $714. Honor GT Pro was $714 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor GT Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (92/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 73/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor GT Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (46/100 vs 29/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor GT Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra?

The Honor GT Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Honor GT Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra?

The Honor GT Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor GT Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra?

The Honor GT Pro leads on camera score (81/100 vs 73/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor GT Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra?

The Honor GT Pro leads on performance (92/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Honor GT Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra?

The Honor GT Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a better fit for active users.