Honor GT Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

The Honor GT Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $485 and $2199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor GT Pro leads — 83/100 vs 78/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Honor GT Pro has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,453,998 vs 3,280,245); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is thinner (4.1mm vs 8.6mm).

The Honor GT Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor GT Pro

Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 81
Battery 70
Portability 46
Value for money 88

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 78
Camera 67
Battery 61
Portability 66
Value for money 64

What makes Honor GT Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 60W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 212g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $485 vs $2199

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (70/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3453998 vs 3280245
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor GT Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Honor GT Pro scores 5 points higher (83/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor GT Pro leads (81/100 vs 67/100). Value score: Honor GT Pro — 88/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 64/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Honor GT Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Honor GT Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor GT Pro (66/100 vs 46/100).

Honor GT Pro: The Honor GT Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor GT Pro Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3280245 3453998
Geekbench Single 3013 3639
Geekbench Multi 9287 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1224x2800 1968x2184
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7200 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 90W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 10 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP48
Dimensions 162.1×75.7×8.6 mm —
Weight 212 g 215 g
Launch price $485 $2199

Camera comparison

Honor GT Pro

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera

Display comparison

Honor GT Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Battery and charging

Honor GT Pro

  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
70
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor GT Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor GT Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
83/100
3280245 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
78/100 +5.0%
3453998 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Honor GT Pro by 5.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor GT Pro

$485

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

$2199

Launch price difference: $1714. Honor GT Pro was $1714 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Honor GT Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor GT Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor GT Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor GT Pro (66/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor GT Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Honor GT Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor GT Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Honor GT Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 78/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor GT Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Honor GT Pro leads on camera score (81/100 vs 67/100).

Should you choose the Honor GT Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Honor GT Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.